I'm only surpriesd I hadn't heard about it before. I think this is a very serious topic that the OLPC team should look into!"
Cfm en oplc full#
How can the worldwide community if teachers, FLOSS developers, and contributors to the OLPC project be assured that no "spying", or "tracking" code will exist in the antennas firmware, if their specifications wont be disclosed (or will only be to a few select developers who agree to Non Disclosure Agreements)? Personally, my potential involvement with the project will be based on this simple fact: Nobody except a few will know how the antennas and meshing work, and the code that comes out for it, even if free software, may be obscured enough to leave the full functionality of it still in the dark. " I originally posted this snippet above. My (an others) concerns were moved to, and I still haven't heard a response about it: Most have been answered, except the one about the fact that the specs of the "wifi chips" are closed, even if free firmware is being developed for it. Like be paranoid about free WiFi in the USA.Ĭoncerns about the ability of someone (either the local governments or outside agencies) of tracking, monitoring, or spying on the olpc's has been raised in the wiki a few times. As much as Danieloso might think OLPC would be that important, they have way better things to do. The OLPC XO is a communications tool, and like other technology (cell phones, Internet cafes, even radio), governments can use it to control as well as educate.īut again, I have the firm conviction that neither the Central Intelligence Agency, nor the National Security Agency (NSA), and definitely not the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) will be looking over the shoulder of students in developing countries. Unfortunately, because of that OLPC's might be used by governments to spy on their populace. In many countries, such a family relationship would be expected to intertwine interests, and there would not be much negative fallout if the country's spying organ associated with an educational cause. I thought for sure that the Negroponte brothers' connection would've been an early rumor to discredit One Laptop Per Child. Still, I'm surprised this conspiracy theory didn't come up earlier. As of Tuesday, he is now confirmed as Deputy Secretary of State in the US State Department - a whole other organization with a strong dislike of the CIA. John Negroponte isn't Director of the CIA any more. Of course, the best part of Danieloso's conspiracy theory is that he is two days late. I know I would personally go epileptic if any law enforcement organ tried to get into the OLPC implementation process. In addition, I am sure every single OLPC developer and corporate sponsor would walk away from OLPC in a heartbeat if the idea of a CIA + OLPC collaboration was even mentioned as a possibility.
Cfm en oplc professional#
Professional honor, morals, respect, and good old brotherly competition between these two overachievers would make them bristle at the mere suggestion of such a collaboration. No matter your opinion of their respective professional career paths, they are professionals. I have the full confidence that neither Negroponte ever entertained such an idea.
Yes, according to Danieloso, just because the Negroponte's are brothers, the CIA will be spying on the educational activities of millions of students in the developing world through the Children's Machine XO.
And what might that mean? According to Danieloso (via Google Translate): You would give the education of your children to the Council of National Intelligence of the United States? This is exactly what million parents in the world are on the verge of making thanks to project OLPC (One Laptop Per Child). Spanish-language blogger, Danieloso, has finally realized that Nicholas Negroponte, Chairman of One laptop Per Child has a brother, John Negroponte, who was Director of the US Central Intelligence Agency. We now have a second OLPC conspiracy theory, perfect for a Friday chuckle.
0 kommentar(er)
